1.本刊收到新的稿件後，由主編初步篩選。如文章篇幅過短或明顯不符合本刊學術水準要求，則由主編決定直接退稿。
2.若論文篇幅適中、具有一定學術水準，主編按照編委的研究專長指定一位編委（或由主編自己）擔任責任編輯。
3.若責任編輯認為稿件可送外審，即請執行編輯邀請審稿人，送匿名評審評閱，依審查意見決定是否請作者修改。
4.若責任編輯認為稿件不必送外審，則草擬退稿原因，由執行編輯發出退稿函。
5. 作者修改後重新提交，責任編輯依第一輪評審意見及稿件的修改情況決定：(1)請匿名評審複審，(2)接受，(3)退稿。
Review Process
The Journal follows by the norms of blind reviewing to select articles. In the blind review process, a manuscript that contains no information that identifies the author(s) is sent to the editorial committee for initial screening. If the committee decides to send the manuscript out for review, the editor-in-chief appoints an editor to take charge of the manuscript.
To conduct the blind review, that editor sends the manuscript to at least two anonymous reviewers and then uses their recommendations in deciding whether to accept or reject the manuscript or request to revisions.
All research articles in the Journal must go through rigorous peer review that includes initial editorial screening and anonymous refereeing by at least two reviewers. |
