本文探討主軸在於分析朱丹溪是否具有類似《管子》「內靜外敬」之思維結構存在。其主要目的是希望透過本文之研究成果，間接成為佐證劉蕺山、周敦頤同樣具有「內靜外敬」實踐形式之身體論述基礎。本文分析中，筆者首先針對朱丹溪相火論之工夫言說進行爬梳，繼而在其「人心聽命於道心而又主之以靜」論述下，分析其它文本中由醫釋儒的詮釋內容也具有「主敬」工夫之思維，最後筆者則在此全方位之展開下，確實還原出朱丹溪思維中的確具有內靜外敬之實踐結構。透過此結果，筆者近年強調劉蕺山、周敦頤也具有「內靜外敬」實踐結構之論述觀點，今後也將獲得更堅實之佐證。

The article probed into whether Zhu Dan-Xi had thought and structures similar to ＂inner tranquility and outer respect＂ in Guanzi. The chief purpose was to indirectly prove that Liu Ji-Shan and Zhou Dun-Yi had the argumentation base of the body in the implementation form of ＂inner tranquility and outer respect＂ based on the result of the study. In the process of analysis, the author first organized the argumentation of the skill of Zhu Dan-Xi's ministerial-fire. Based on the discourse of ＂human minds obey Dao, and tranquility is main focus,＂ she analyzed other texts and found that the interpretation of Confucianism by medicine contained the thought of ＂tranquility＂ skill as well. Last but not least, she truly restored the implementation structure of inner tranquility and outer respect in Zhu Dan-Xi's thought under comprehensive development. Based on the result, the argumentation and viewpoint of Liu Ji-Shan and Zhou Dun-Yi having the implementation structure of ＂inner tranquility and outer respect,＂ which the author had emphasized in recent years, will be more firmly verified from now on.