| 戰國秦漢「六經（五經）一體」觀念的形成與經解新變 |
| “Unity of the Six Classics (Five Classics)”: The Formation and Transformation of Classical Interpretations during the Warring States, Qin, and Han Periods |
 |
| 作者 |
王誠御 |
| Author |
Wang, Cheng-Yu |
| 關鍵詞 |
六經一體、
許慎、
鄭玄、
五經異義、
訓詁學
|
| Keywords |
unity of the Six Classics,
Xu Shen,
Zheng Xuan,
Different Interpretations of the Meaning of the Five Classics,
Chinese philology
|
| 摘要 |
「六經（五經）一體」觀念，乃指經書文本形成、典範性確
立以後，戰國至秦漢學者將作者不同、成書時間不一、內容參差
不齊的眾多經書文本，整合為一個學術思想體系。西漢以降，此
一觀念進一步影響經解實踐，以標舉「異義」的代表性著作《五
經異義》為例，可具體考察許慎、鄭玄如何在「六經（五經）一
體」觀念影響下，開展經學論辯與經解實踐。本文除析論「六經
（五經）一體」觀念的形成歷程以外，也一並分析許、鄭異同所
呈現的經學思路、方法變遷。「六經（五經）一體」觀念如果
不僅僅是經學史、訓詁學史上久已無人措意的陳跡，而是有待不斷
完善的理論創造，則此一觀念恆常為有志者、力所能及者開放，
日新其義蘊。 |
| Abstract |
The conception of the “unity of the Six Classics (Five Classics)”
refers to the integration, by scholars from the Warring States through
the Qin and Han periods, of a large number of classical texts—written
by different authors, compiled at different times, and varied in
content—into a single, coherent intellectual system after the
formation of the canonical texts and the establishment of their
normative status. From the Western Han onward, this concept further
shaped practices of classical interpretation. Taking Different
Interpretations of the Meaning of the Five Classics (Wujing Yiyi), a
representative work that foregrounds divergent interpretations (yiyi),
as an example, one can concretely examine how Xu Shen and Zheng
Xuan, under the influence of the conception of “unity of the Six
Classics (Five Classics),” developed debates in classical learning and
engaged in exegetical practice. In addition to analyzing the process
through which the conception “unity of the Six Classics (Five
Classics)” took shape, this article also examines the different and
shared features of Xu Shen’s and Zheng Xuan’s approaches, as well
as the transformations in exegetical thinking and methodology they reveal. If the conception of “unity of the Six Classics (Five Classics)”
is not merely a long-neglected relic in the histories of classical studies
and philology, but rather a form of theoretical creativity that calls for
continual refinement, then it remains perpetually open to those
aspiring to and are capable of contributing to it, constantly renewing
and enriching its meanings. |
|
|
|
