(142)
|
| 研究型創作之交鋒與「藝術知識」初探 |
| The Crossroads of Research-Based Art and “Artistic Epistemology” |
 |
| 作者 |
高俊宏 |
| Author |
Kao JunHonn |
| 關鍵詞 |
當代藝術、
研究型創作、
知識型、
文件、
無明
|
| Keywords |
Contemporary Art,
Research-Based Art,
Epistemology,
Documentation,
Vidyā
|
| 摘要 |
近年來，研究型創作（research-based art）在台灣當代藝術的領域，可謂蔚為主流。探究箇中原因，除了不可避免地受到西方主流藝術的影響，以及在地藝術領域自身的脈絡之外，主要還是在於創作者希望走出過往相對「封閉」的藝術美學，思考如何能夠與今日議題化、訊息化的「知識經濟」社會形成對話，而不至於困守於過往的窠臼。過往的創作模式因為缺乏社會議題的延展度與知識開創性而備受考驗。當代藝術的「創作」因為研究的先行而有所不同。
縱使如此，研究型創作在發展的過程當中也招致不少爭議，對於藝術純粹性的擁護者而言，這類「研究先行」、「議題導向」的創作不啻是以藝術來服務議題、點綴研究爾爾。兩方各持己見、各擁立場的狀況，可以說是目前當代藝術的潛在張力之一。基於上述理由，本文以「交鋒」作為命題，嘗試探索研究型創作的各方正、反觀點，並進一步探索研究型創作所導引出來的可能之「藝術知識」，其開敞性、不可定義性，以及相關的界限為何。 |
| Abstract |
In recent years, research-based art has emerged as the predominant trend within the realm of contemporary art in Taiwan. The primary factor contributing to this phenomenon is the interplay between the mainstream Western art, the local art scene, and the evolving artistic landscape. Artists today are able to engage in a meaningful dialogue with the contemporary “knowledge economy,” which emphasizes thematic exploration and information dissemination. This departure from the traditional confines of art aesthetics allows creators to avoid stagnation and embrace new possibilities. Previous methods of creation have undergone scrutiny due to their limited consideration of social concerns and intellectual innovation. The process of creating contemporary art is consequently more distinct.
Nevertheless, the development of research-based creation has been the subject of considerable controversy. For proponents of artistic integrity, the practice of prioritizing research and focusing on specific issues in the creative process is viewed as a form of utilizing art to address and enhance research objectives. The phenomenon in which opposing perspectives and positions are maintained by both parties can be regarded as a potential source of tension within the realm of contemporary art. This article aims to examine the concept of “clashing” and its implications within the context of research-based creation. The article seeks to analyze both the positive and negative perspectives surrounding this phenomenon, as well as delve into the notion of “artistic knowledge” that emerges from research-based creation. Additionally, it explores the characteristics of openness, indefiniteness, and the associated boundaries within this creative. |
|
|
|
