| 獨特視角下的章學誠研究 ——《章學誠研究述評（1920-1985）》之述評 |
| The Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng by Unique Perspective ——The Review of The Review of the Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng（1920-1985） |
 |
| 作者 |
賈慶軍 |
| Author |
Jia, Qing-jun |
| 關鍵詞 |
章學誠、
道、
六經皆史、
王陽明
|
| Keywords |
Zhang xue-cheng、Dao、Six Confucian Classics are all Historical Works、Wang yang-ming
|
| 摘要 |
黃兆強教授的新著《章學誠研究述評（1920-1985）》是章學誠研究的又一力作。本文在評述該著的同時，也提出了自己的觀點。筆者發現，實齋「六經皆史」論是建立在其道論基礎上的，而實齋的道論有三個層次：第一層次的道乃萬物之所以然之「道」；第二層的道即周公之治道；第三層之道乃是載入典籍中的道。實齋之道論最後停留在第二層，這使其更接近朱子而不是陽明。 |
| Abstract |
Professor Huang Zhao-qiang’s new work of The Review of the Study of Zhang Xue-Cheng（1920-1985） is the masterpiece about the study of Zhang xue-cheng.The author also put forward his own point of view while reviewing Professor Huang Zhao-qiang’s new work.The author found that Zhang xue-cheng’s theory that six confucian classics were all historical works was based on his theory of Dao.His theory of Dao contained three levels:the Dao which produced everything;the Dao which Zhou Gong managing things;the Dao which recorded in the classics. Zhang xue-cheng preferenced the Dao of the second level. Zhang xue-cheng was the successor of Zhu xi but not of Wang yang-ming. |
|
|
|
