FaceBook pڭ
第 66  期

專題論文
Special Issue

  (81)
Regan 與動物權
Regan and Animal Rights
作者 田錦宏
Author Jonah Tyan
關鍵詞 權利動物權道德責任動物對待
Keywords right, animal rights, moral duty, treatment of animals
摘要 動物權的概念已經廣泛地被認可為善待動物的一個道德理論。Tom Regan所主張的動物權立場被認為是動物權倡導者中最強的一派,但也遭受到極大的批判。所以,我們提出兩個問題:「動物有權利嗎?」及「Regan動物權的權力基礎是什麼?」透過評論Regan的動物權,我們認為那些批判與爭辯的原因出於Regan對權利概念的誤用。首先,我們對權利的概念及權利與責任的相關性進行探討,接下來,我們釐清誰可以擁有權利。我們進一步提供一個更可行的權利立場來解釋Regan的動物權。最後,我們回答前述兩個問題:(1) 動物具有部分道德權利;(2) 特別權利可做為Regan動物權之更好的權利基礎。
Abstract The concept of animal rights has received significant acceptance as a moral theory for ethical treatment of animals. Tom Regan’s animal rights view is considered as the strongest position among animal rightists, but encountered
enormous critiques. Therefore, we pose two questions: “do animals have right?” and “what is the ground of Regan’s animal rights view?”. Through the commentary of Regan’s animal rights view, we argue those critiques and debates are originated from the misuse of the concept of rights. We first investigate the concept of rights and the correlativity between right and duty, then, examine who can possess rights. Further, we offer a more plausible right position to interpret Regan’s animal rights view. In conclusion, we answer two questions: (1) animals have certain moral rights, and (2) the more plausible ground of Regan’s animal rights is special rights.
專題按語
/ 李凱恩    Jack Lee
道德對待動物之理由淺悉
/ 李凱恩    Jack Lee
1
《從《「人-人-動物」三元關係談動物 權辯論中之「他群」》
/ 盧倩儀    Chien-Yi Lu
15
我們對動物的責任
/ 柯志明    Chih-Ming Ke
29
將人與動物作「平等考量」的理據 — 與效益主義哲學家Peter Singer的對話
/ 釋昭慧    Chao-Hwei Shih
61
Tom Regan動物權學說初探
/ 張秀惠    Hsiu-Hui Chang
95
由 Singer動物解放探討原住民狩獵與 動物保護
/ 徐翠文    
109
© 2017 NCU Journal of Humanities. All Rights Reserved.